- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- Rare Carat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Run of the mill org. Fails WP:ORGIND with routine press coverage. scope_creep (talk) 08:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 08:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 08:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination - promotional, WP:BEFORE turns up mainly PR work, which this seems also to be. Melcous (talk) 09:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Promotional article; promotional references. London Hall (talk) 10:59, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTSPAM. MER-C 14:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, preferably G11. Obvious spam. Guy (Help!) 14:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:SUSTAINED. Edwardx (talk) 16:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, WP:ORGIND is exactly right. Especially noting that forbes.com/sites is essentially a bloghost. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom, fails WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 18:51, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.