- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
- Tyler Turkle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
appears non-notable. Most of the sources seem to be passing mentions, as opposed to detailed and about him as an artist. There may also be some copyvio issues, but may be backwards copying going on as well. --Mdann52talk to me! 17:13, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
- delete as hoax, ban the Wikipedian globally as chronic hoax-producer. JSTOR shows 0 mentions. Google Scholar shows only a single self-made reference inserted into World-Cat. I think we, and not only us, have been conned, starting in 2008. I suggest that impeccable art historian sourcing be consulted. The artist is not mentioned by the Metropolitan Museum's art history series encyclopedic review addressing the subject of Plastic in Arts: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/mome/hd_mome.htm . --Mareklug talk 17:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
delete unless better evidence of notability can be found. I searched for a while and had no luck. He's had about 5 pieces sell at auction in Sweden, which isn't very significant for someone who's apparently been an artist for over 40 years. The sources cited are evidence of particular 'facts', and not even of the claims that would indicate any real notability. As far as I can tell from searching, no critic of note has ever discussed him. Reventtalk 17:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, ban. DS (talk) 19:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 02:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 02:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 02:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 02:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- delete - especially per the research done by Mareklug and Revent. With the amount of time since the article was created notability seems to have decreased. MarnetteD|Talk 05:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for reading my appeal… Respected editors, I am appalled at this “synergistic hunt” that I believe was started when Mr. Revent wrote December 7th on the Proposed Deletions Page; it seems to have missed this page. It has been suggested by Mr. Revent that Webmeister1 and Tyler Turkle are 1 simply due to the fact that I (Webmeister1) uploaded images and placed into the “Source” category the words “Own Work”. I have just explained to Mr. Revent on his talk page that I did so because I believed I was to upload accurate information about the producer of the product who is Tyler Turkle - plain and simple. This is why I stated the source as "Own Work" because it is his "Own Work". If I was in error for doing so in this manner then I stand corrected, but to begin from that point to assume Mr. Turkle as a hoax is not right. To use words such as “ ban the Wikipedian globally as chronic hoax-producer” and that you “have been conned” are rather harsh and possibly harassment, especially having justified the words on such a basic user error. I implore you to reconsider this deletion you are proposing and to cease the defamation that seems to be continuing.
Extended content
|
---|
Tyler Turkle Wikipedia Page Earlier I wrote this experience as a “synergistic hunt” because of the snowball that started with my error in uploading to Wiki Commons. Mr. Turkle is an American Contemporary Artist and Filmmaker, and if you please take the time to review the sources and references I have provided on his Wikipedia page you will see that his work has been shown in many notable shows and he has produced many American Contemporary films. Mr. Turkle’s work with plastic is unique. It is a painstaking many hours process of the flowing of multiple layers of plastic. It is this style of art that makes his technique most unique. Respected Editors, I ask you, is it a dollar amount that must be met to make it to Wikipedia. How many pieces must an artist sell before their Wikipedia page is not banned? I dare say, but I must for my own sanity, I feel as though the efforts that have been put forth towards the removal of any and all of Mr. Tyler’s art, and now his Wikipedia page, is a slap to, and an attack on American Contemporary Art and Artists. Banning this artist, as well as others due to some level of socially acceptable level of notoriety will only serve to “leash” future American Contemporary Artist who play such a wonderful and important role in holding us together as a nation. Coatrack There was mention that the Plastic in Art page that I (Webmeister1) edited was a “Coatrack”. Until this day I did not know what “Coatrack” was, but I do now. I understand now that the way I edited could be construed as that. I will work to provide a better product in the future. Thank you for understanding that not all Wikipedia Editors can be as proficient as you, we are learning. I wish to work with you in amicably working toward restoring the pages that have been so unjustly removed. Thank you for this consideration… I will also post this to the undelete request page.Webmeister1 (talk) 03:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— Thank you for your expeditious reply. Reliable sources have recognized this American Contemporary Artist and Filmmaker and he is worthy of being recognized as an American Contemporary Artist. I am providing to you a list of reliable Individual Exhibitions, Group Exhibitions, Publications from know art critics, Bibliographies, public and Museum locations all of which have either featured, written about or exhibited Mr. Turkle's works. I appeal to the consensus to not permit the deletion of Tyler Turkle's Wikipedia page and to allow this American Contemporary Artist and Filmmaker to continue his page.
Bibliography
Group Exhibitions
Individual Exhibitions
|
- Delete, but willing to reconsider. Emotional appeals and extensive lists of exhibits don't constitute significant coverage of the artist. Arguments for keeping must be grounded in Wikipedia policies and guidelines. We need to see evidence of significant coverage of the artist (not just his works) in reliable, independent sources. That's all that matters. Other than the coverage in Press Democrat (that's a good source and good coverage but it's in the External links section, not used as a reference), what else is there? Would the proponent please explain what in the bibliography listed above constitutes coverage, more than a trivial mention of the artist, and more than a picture of a work in an exhibition? ~Amatulić (talk) 19:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you again for this opportunity. I do understand about "emotional appeals" it is just that I don't feel American contemporary Artists are being represented so it is important to me, sorry to have come out of the box that way. I am providing some additional coverage as you requested. I do appreciate this consideration.
- Thank you again for this opportunity. I do understand about "emotional appeals" it is just that I don't feel American contemporary Artists are being represented so it is important to me, sorry to have come out of the box that way. I am providing some additional coverage as you requested. I do appreciate this consideration.
- Tallahassee Newspaper Review
- Art show Review American Newspaper
- Canyon Cinema Review
- Oyster Boy Review
- Canyon Cinema Salon - Recently Mr. Turkle was invited as the presenting Artist Filmmaker Webmeister1 (talk) 01:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- OK, so we have two reviews in a low-circulation local paper, two pages on the website of a local theater (not reliable as the purpose is to promote their business, and arguably not independent since they're showing his films), and the oysterboy one is just a list of photographs. The Tallahassee Democrat pieces are decent coverage but I'd like to see something more significant than local coverage. I'm not seeing significant coverage of the subject by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. At this point my view to delete is unchanged. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Tallahassee Newspaper Review
- Keep - Thank you, I would like to provide additional evidence of coverage.
- NOTE: For many of the Exhibitions I have listed above when they read "catalog" at the end that means that the coverage of Mr. Turkle has been cataloged and is available for review. Some can be purchased.
- NOTE: Within the list of Collins & Milazzo Exhibitions Wikipedia page, Mr. Turkle is noted many times as having exhibited in their exhibitions.
- Below are a few of exhibition catalogs that will show an excerpt of Mr. Turkle's presence in the catalog:
- “A New Low,” Claudio Botello Gallery, Turin, Italy – curated by Collins & Milazzo – catalogue
Webmeister1 (talk) 04:13, 12 December 2014 (UTC)- Exhibition catalogs are not independent sources because they have a relationship with the artist. And the Plastic Water magazine doesn't mention Turkle at all, as far as I can see. I don't believe you are understanding Wikipedia's requirements for evidence of notability. We need independent and reliable sources, preferably with an audience larger than a narrow niche, that provide significant coverage of Turkle. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete -Subject lacking significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources doesn't merit a Wikipedia article and qualifies for deletion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:31, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - After researching the meaning of notability for living people as applied on several sample category pages (e.g. Florida State University Faculty, Kent State Alumni, or University of Mount Union alumni), it would appear that approximately every other entry should be deleted according the standards mentioned above. Also, the concerns raised do not seem to be severe according to the deletion policy, leaving me to wonder why they weren't first raised in the related talk page. I am by no means an expert on the editorial process, but this is confusing to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mycotn (talk • contribs) 23:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC) — Mycotn (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- @Mycotn: You may find WP:OSE an interesting reading in this context. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 08:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find enough evidence on Google books to convince me that he exists (at least to the same extent Banksy exists: a name on some artworks with no personal detail behind it). And he appears to have worked with or shown with Serrano, who is unquestionably notable. But the only thing I saw that looked like nontrivial coverage of him (as opposed to announcements of showings, or one-sentence mentions in reviews of group shows) was this magazine article link that I can't actually read because it's only on snippet view. Being online is not a requirement for our sources, but evidence that one source exists (without the source itself) is not the in-depth coverage in *multiple* sources required by WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:57, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- Exists? of course he exists. Mr. Turkle's art and films have been in exhibitions, museums and shown all over the world. For an American Contemporary Artist this is an accomplishment. His art using the painstaking process of flowing multiple layers of plastic is unique. No one else uses this technique.
I would not say that these articles are nontrival as was suggested that nothing other than announcements of showings were available:
Canyon Cinema
FAb Four Art Show
"Last of a Kind" Film ReviewWebmeister1 (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.