- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Tone 21:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wulfram 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable game. There is no coverage in reliable third party sources. DDDtriple3 (talk) 19:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 18:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:N and WP:sources. The article is completely unsourced, and there is no proof of notability. EconomistBR 11:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:N and WP:RS. --Pmedema (talk) 17:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails Notability.--SkyWalker (talk) 08:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.